February 27, 2014
E.Q. How does force/manipulation influence change in Hamlet?
Obj: I can identify credible sources
I can formulate an argument.
Starter:
In your opinion, which side won the debate yesterday?
Why did they deserve to win?
Activity:
Today we will begin working on the research paper for Hamlet.
Below you will find the instructions and rubric for the paper.
The time has come!
After completing Hamlet,
you will be constructing a formal argumentative research paper based on the
reading. Argumentative research papers
provide a format for writers to introduce a topic and inform the intended
audience on his/her stance on it. In
class, we will be working on creating a thesis and conducting research for this
paper. In crafting such a paper, we will
be working on critical thinking skills, determining credible sources, and constructing
composition.
The prompt for this essay stems from our overarching big
idea:
How does force/manipulation
influence change in Hamlet?
**If you have a desire to research another topic feel free to talk to me about it. I am open to suggestions if you have another idea in mind for your paper. I only ask that you talk to me before getting started.
**If you have a desire to research another topic feel free to talk to me about it. I am open to suggestions if you have another idea in mind for your paper. I only ask that you talk to me before getting started.
While reading the play, it would be very beneficial to keep
this idea in mind. Jot down information
that relates to this idea and evidence from the text, so when it comes time to
begin researching you already have a solid foundation.
Requirements for the Paper:
3-5 pages
12 pt. Times New Roman Font
Double Spaced
MLA format
Supporting evidence from text and at least one other source
Thesis
Work Cited
Rubric:
100
|
92
|
84
|
Revise
|
|
Introduction
(15 points)
|
The introduction is inviting,
states the thesis and previews the structure of the paper.
|
The introduction clearly states
the thesis and may preview the structure of the paper.
|
The introduction states the
thesis, but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper nor is it
particularly inviting to the reader.
|
There is no clear introduction of
the main topic or structure of the paper.
|
Focus on Topic
(10 points)
|
There is one clear, well-focused
topic. Main idea stands out and is supported by detailed information.
|
Main idea is clear but the
supporting information is general.
|
Main idea is somewhat clear but
there is a need for more supporting information.
|
The main idea is not clear. There
is a seemingly random collection of information.
|
Support for Topic
(20 points)
|
Relevant, telling, quality details
give the reader important information and uses quotes appropriately and
effectively.
|
Supporting details and information
are relevant, and there is an appropriate use of quotes.
|
Supporting details and information
are relevant, but quotes are absent or used ineffectively.
|
Supporting details and information
are typically unclear or not related to the topic.
|
Conclusion
(10 points)
|
The conclusion is strong and
leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the writer is
"getting at."
|
The conclusion is recognizable and
ties up almost all the loose ends.
|
The conclusion is recognizable,
but does not tie up several loose ends.
|
There is no clear conclusion, the
paper just ends.
|
Sources
(15 points)
|
All sources used for quotes are
appropriate, well integrated and cited correctly.
|
The sources used for quotes are
mostly appropriate and cited correctly.
|
Most sources used for quotes are
appropriate, but may not be cited correctly or well integrated.
|
An outside source may be lacking,
and/or there are few if any relevant quotes.
|
Grammar & Spelling
(10 points)
|
Writer makes few or no errors in
grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes a few errors in
grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes several errors in
grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes many errors in
grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Sentence Structure
(10 points)
|
All sentences are well-constructed
with varied structure.
|
Most sentences are
well-constructed with varied structure.
|
Most sentences are
well-constructed but have a similar structure.
|
Sentences lack structure and
appear incomplete or rambling.
|
Works Cited
(10 points)
|
Works Cited is accurately
constructed. Sources are used in the essay.
|
Works Cited is accurate for the
most part. sources are used in the essay.
|
Works Cited has several errors in
format. Sources may not be addressed in the essay.
|
Works Cited has many errors in
format and/or is missing.
|
Closure:
Create a S.M.A.R.T goal to help you work on your paper this week.
No comments:
Post a Comment